Now we know what Palin reads :P

Comments

"Now about those rape victims who had to pay for their own rape kits?"

Ugh, this again. This isn't a legit argument. Again there were about a thousand items in that bill and the rape kits clause was slipped in the middle. The sad thing is that I believe these clauses are slipped into legislation in an attempt to strong arm people into voting for it. If it was really about rape kits then it would not have been slipped in the the middle of a piece of huge legislation.

Maybe someone should put out a piece of legislation saying it is now legal to shoot people as long as it is in the back. In the middle of the legislation there can be a clause that states people that we should not torture children. Then, when someone votes against it, we can say they voted against legislation that said we shouldn't torture children. Sound good?
I meant in Wasilla, where the state of Alaska re-wrote their law because Wasilla, was the only city making victims pay because it was a burden to tax payers. Not the national one McCain voted on.
Palin can read? Who knew?
Have a link? Was that Wasilla law before she became mayor or did she enact that?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jacob-alperinsheriff/sarah-palin-instituted-ra_b_125833.html
She's quotes Starbucks cups AND the New York Times both lately, it seems she can not only read but reads a lot! As long as it's quotes about hell and/or is something she can turn into Obama being a terrorist ;)

Hmm... I wonder what the rationale behind the change was and if she was aware. I know she should have been. I did notice the quote by the campaign spokeswoman.

"does not believe, nor has she ever believed, that rape victims should have to pay for an evidence-gathering test...To suggest otherwise is a deliberate misrepresentation of her commitment to supporting victims and bringing violent criminals to justice,"

"turn into Obama being a terrorist"
Why does the opposing candidate have to bring up the Bill Ayers thing? Why hasn't this been covered extensively in the main stream media? They are legit questions that concern people. I have emailed back and forth with Bill Ayers personally and this is a guy who knowingly and admittedly bombed the pentagon and other places in the United States. Now Obama says he is a "good friend". He announced his candidacy from Ayers home. Ayers also wrote grants for Obama when he was a community organizer. Does this make Obama a terrorist? Absolutely not. Does it show a horrible lack of judgment to announce from his house? I think so. Don't you? Shouldn't this be a story, not to connect him as a terrorist, that is ridiculous. But to show this instance of horrible judgment. Why should this not be brought up?
If she wasn't aware in a town that size with her police chief being against the state law change (there's a quote from him somewhere saying he's disappointed they now had to charge as it burdens tax payers) she's an idiot :/

I've seen nothing to prove they're the buddies Palin is making them out to be, the fact she used the word "fearful" and keeps beating the He doesn't see America as you and I do message.. Pals around with terrorists, etc tells me it's a scare tactic. As soon as I heard it my initial thought with the way she was wording it is she's playing to those who believe those "he's a Muslim and Muslims are terrorists" emails.

Everything I've found says at most they met a dozen times for basically local political / school reform reasons and aren't "pals" and Obama has always denounced the actions that happened when he was 8. But meeting someone when you're all grown up and they're a professor and you're working for the same things -- to work on the education system, it'd be easy to not see that person as a TERRORIST, I'd assume considering Ayers is now teaching people's kids and no one seems to have a problem with that? It's already been a story and if the relationship was really as close or evil as they're saying I'm positive it'd have come out by now, it hasn't... so the way Palin is spinning it like he's some kind of buddy buddy with terrorists is just too much. The way she is wording it is nothing short of implying Obama supports terrorism and is a traitor.
Ugh, I had a long response written out and I lost it. I come back later
VOX must like you as much as it likes me right now then... I thought maybe it was just my net since MySpace didn't like me either :P

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in